Learn More

Maximizing your health so you’re not dependent on allopathic drugs and surgery procedures is a key to your well-being as well as your financial future.

Average family of four health care costs are up 7.3%, or $1,319 from last year, according to independent actuarial and health care consulting firm Milliman Inc.

A 2012 systemic review found spinal manipulation therapy to be more cost-effective for neck and low back pain when compared with general practitioner care, physiotherapy or exercise. A study in 2007 compared care costs of a patient under the direction of a chiropractor as their primary care physician (PCP) versus a medical doctor. After 70,000 member-months spanning a 7-year period, hospital admission costs were decreased by 60.2 percent, cost of days spent in the hospital were decreased by 59.0 percent, and outpatient surgeries and procedures were down by 62.0 percent. If these numbers were not astonishing enough, the costs associated with pharmaceuticals decreased by 85 percent when compared to conventional medically driven care. All of these comparisons were done in the same time frame, geography, and health maintenance organization product.

Learn More: http://www.naturalnews.com/036129_chiropractic_medical_care_cost_effectiveness.html

Average family of four health care costs are up 7.3%, or $1,319 from 2012 to 2013, according to independent actuarial and health care consulting firm Milliman Inc.

A health insurance plan with a chiropractic benefit had lower costs than a plan without it. A study reported in the American Medical Association’s journal found health plans that included a chiropractic benefit had 31 percent fewer back surgeries and 15 percent lower per capita hospital costs. The study compared 700,000 health plan members with chiropractic benefits to 1 million members without chiropractic benefits in California, and showed that overall health care expenditures were lower in the group with chiropractic coverage. Source: Archives of Internal Medicine, October 2004.

Oakland University’s Stano Cost Comparison Study of 395,641 patients with one or more of 493 neuromusculoskeletal conditions was undertaken to compare the health care costs of patients who have received chiropractic treatment to those treated solely by medical or osteopathic physicians. The results showed that patients receiving chiropractic care experienced significantly lower health care costs. Chiropractic patients saved over $1000 per patient over the two-year study.

A 1992 review of data from over 2,000,000 users of chiropractic care in the U.S., reported in the Journal of American Health Policy, stated that, “chiropractic users tend to have substantially lower total health care costs,” and “chiropractic care reduces the use of both physician and hospital care.”

AV MED, a large HMO in the southeast, wanted to see if it could save money by having patients visit chiropractors for back pain. They chose 100 patients, eighty who had already been treated medically without results. In each case, the patient had been seen by an average of 1.8 medical doctors. After receiving chiropractic adjustments, not one of the 100 patients had to have surgery. Furthermore, 86 percent of them got better and none of them got worse. Herbert Davis, M.D., the medical director of AV MED, said that chiropractic care saved the HMO $250,000 in surgical costs alone!

A Landmark study was conducted by Dr. Ron Rupert and his team at Parker College. The study surveyed 311 chiropractic patients, aged 65 years and older, who had received chiropractic care for 5 years or longer. Despite similar health status, chiropractic patients receiving “maintenance or wellness care” for five years or longer, when compared with US citizens of the same age, spent only 31% of the national average for health care services. The chiropractic patients also experienced 50% fewer medical provider visits than their comparable peers.

What do these studies have to do with your future? The answer is “everything.” Heath care in the United States currently consumes about one in every six dollars spent in the United States, and will consume an estimated one in every five dollars by the year 2015. It is projected that by the end of the next decade, the government will be paying about half of the nation’s medical costs.

A report from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimated that both government and private spending for health care will average $12,320 per person in 2015, almost double the 2005 figure of $6,683. The nation’s health care bill could total more than $4 trillion in ten years. (U.S. Health Care Bill by 2015: $4 Trillion. abcnews.com. 2/22/06).

J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007 (May); 30 (4): 263–269
A new retrospective analysis of 70,274 member-months in a 7-year period within an IPA, comparing medical management to chiropractic management, demonstrated decreases of

60.2% in-hospital admissions,
59.0% hospital days,
62.0% outpatient surgeries and procedures,
and 83% pharmaceutical costs when compared with conventional medicine IPA performance.
This clearly demonstrates that chiropractic nonsurgical nonpharmaceutical approaches generates reductions in both clinical and cost utilization when compared with PCPs using conventional medicine alone.

Doctors of chiropractic serving as primary care physicians led to better clinical and cost outcomes. When doctors of chiropractic served as primary care physicians in an Illinois health maintenance organization (HMO), the results were substantially improved clinical and cost outcomes when compared to medical doctor care. The doctors of chiropractic, who emphasized preventive and wellness care, showed:

a 43 percent reduction in patient hospital admissions,
a 58 percent reduction in hospital days,
a 43 percent reduction in outpatient surgeries and procedures,
and a 51 percent reduction in pharmaceutical costs.

The study spanned four years and included 21,743 patient months. Source: Journal of Manipulative and Physiologic Therapeutics, June 2004.

Immediate access to chiropractic care after an injury results in the most effective outcome, medically and financially. A peer-reviewed article in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, January 2004, stated: “. . . We found that patients who were seen by chiropractors during the initial episode of care were less likely to have a surgery, and had a shorter average duration of the initial episode.”
Return on investment on wellness programs: Employers can save $1.65 in healthcare expenses for every $1 spent on a comprehensive employee-wellness program, according to a study published in the Journal of Occupations and Environmental Medicine (JOEM). Pittsburgh-based health insurer Highmark Inc. conducted a study of its own corporate wellness program, which saved $1.3 million during a 4 year period.

Chiropractors who serve as primary care providers (PCPs) save clients money and have high patient satisfaction: A study in the 5/07 issue of the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics tracked data from a unique Independent Physicians Association (IPA) where chiropractors serve as first-contact, primary care physicians. The report analyzes data from 2003-2005 and found that clients visiting chiropractors had
60% fewer hospitalizations,
62% fewer surgeries and
used 85% fewer pharmaceuticals 

than HMO clients who received traditional medical care. In addition, clients reported on the quality of care they received through the use of annual patient satisfaction surveys.
During the 3 years of data, clients demonstrated a high degree of satisfaction with their care
(96%, 94% and 91%, respectively).

Back Pain less costly with ‘alternative’ care: ‘Alternative’ providers, predominantly chiropractors, report significantly less average cost per patient than when clients consult a ‘conventional’ provider, predominantly medical doctors ($342 vs. $506). These figures excluded clients requiring surgical or other hospital care. The study involved over 600,000 adults. Published in the research journal Spine.

Chiropractic is more cost effective than Medical care for Workers Compensation cases: The study was a retrospective review of 96,627 closed injury claims in North Carolina between 1975 and 1994. The results showed that the average cost of treatment, hospitalization, and compensation payments were higher for clients treated by Medical Doctors than for clients treated by Doctors of Chiropractic. The results further showed that the average number of lost workdays was less for clients treated by Chiropractors than MDs. The results were published in the 9/04 issue of the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.

Chiropractic inclusion in Managed care plans saves money: A 4 year study conducted by researchers from the company American Specialty Health Plans, Inc. reviewed the health care utilization of 1.7 million people enrolled in a California managed-care plan. Approximately 1 million of the people had chiropractic coverage while the other 700,000 did not. The results showed that the total health care costs for people in the plans with chiropractic coverage were 12% lower than those without chiropractic coverage. The cost of treating people with low back pain was 28% lower in the group with chiropractic coverage.

Chiropractic care 
reduced hospitalizations among back pain clients by 41% and
reduced back surgeries by 32%.
reduced the cost of medical imaging by 37%.

These results were reported in papers presented at the Research Agenda Conference held in March 2003 and were published in the October 2004 issue of the American Medical Association’s Archives of Internal Medicine.

Additional Studies

J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004 (Jun); 27 (5): 336–347
Analysis of clinical and cost outcomes on 21,743 member months over a 4-year period demonstrated decreases of 43.0% in hospital admissions per 1000, 58.4% hospital days per 1000, 43.2% outpatient surgeries and procedures per 1000, and 51.8% pharmaceutical cost reductions when compared with normative conventional medicine IPA performance for the same HMO product in the same geography over the same time frame.

Healthcare costs are important to everyone. Each year, it seems that we spend more and more money on our basic health needs, and we hear from our patients how they appreciate that chiropractic care can help them keep their health costs lower with non-invasive, non-drug treatment.

A new study published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine has confirmed what our patients say: chiropractic care can help reduce medical expenses.

In this study, researchers compared businesses that had on-site chiropractic care to those who did not. They found that off-site chiropractic patients not only had a higher rate of initial radiology services (like MRI’s, ultrasounds, and CT scans), they also had a greater number of repeat radiological visits too. Furthermore, off-site chiropractic patients experienced “significantly higher outpatient utilization,” showing an increase in repeat services in this area as well.

Off-site chiropractic patients even reported to the emergency room more often than individuals who engaged in on-site chiropractic care. And it should be noted that the off-site group had more chiropractic and physical therapy visits than the on-site group.

Chiropractic has been proven to be a safe and effective way to treat back pain, auto injuries, sciatica, headache, and many other health conditions. If you’d like to improve your health naturally and save money on your healthcare costs, give chiropractic a try.

Even if you have good health insurance, deductibles and co-pays can seriously cut into your budget, potentially putting you in a position where you may have to choose between obtaining quality care and paying your monthly bills. But what if you didn’t have to make that choice, effectively affording to both care for your health and care for your family’s needs? One study suggests that this is a distinct possibility, at least, when you choose chiropractic care.

A review published in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeuticsinvolved assessment of a number of publications, comparing various study results in regard to the cost of treatment in both general medicine and alternative manual therapies (manual therapies were defined as nonsurgical therapies that involve a healthcare professional using his or her hands for diagnosis and treatment of certain physical conditions, such as is the case with chiropractic and osteopathy). The goal was to determine whether one method of treatment was more cost-effective than another, thus saving patients some cash when it came to receiving necessary medical care.

The first step that researchers took was ascertaining the validity of the studies in this area. To choose only the best research possible, they gave each study a score that determined its risk of bias in patient selection, actual performance of the study, and the number of subjects who actually completed the entire piece of research, staying from start to finish. This resulted in only 25 publications out of an original 25,000+ being declared valid enough for purposes of this review.

In these 25 studies determined as the most valid, a majority involved patients with nonspecific pain in their back, neck, shoulders, or ankles. Some engaged with treatment using general practitioners and others received care via manual therapy practitioners. The cost of each was calculated, allowing researchers to determine which method of treatment was generally more expensive.

Based on what they found, researchers concluded that manual therapy is, on average, more cost-effective than treatment obtained by way of general medicine practitioners. This means that there is an economic advantage of choosing chiropractic care versus other forms of medical treatment. As a side note, the researchers also suggested that more valid studies be conducted in order to learn more about this area.

If you want quality care and you want save money, chiropractic is the perfect solution.